Your Privacy

We use cookies for analytics and performance. Review our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

AMPLIFY CONSOLE VS CHECKMARX / VERACODE

Legacy Enterprise SAST vs an Agentic Security Harness.

Checkmarx and Veracode are the enterprise SAST incumbents — they scan code and produce reports. Console is the replacement story: custom detection agents, agentic triage, narrative reporting, and 72-hour onboarding instead of months of professional services.

SEE CONSOLE IN ACTION →
//THE PROBLEM WE SOLVE

Legacy SAST writes the report.
Console replaces the stack.

Checkmarx and Veracode scan source code and produce PDFs. Console is the replacement: custom detection agents tuned to your codebase, agentic triage, narrative reports engineers actually read, and 72-hour onboarding instead of months of professional services.

CHECKMARX / VERACODE

LEGACY SAST

Enterprise SAST incumbents. Strong on compliance certifications, broad language coverage, and audit-trail credibility. Scan code, produce reports, file alongside SOC 2 evidence.

Enterprise compliance certifications (FedRAMP etc.)
Large established customer base
Audit-trail and reporting credibility
Broad legacy language support
Months of professional services to onboard
Vendor CVE lists, not custom detection
3-year contracts are typical
No agentic triage automation
Reports engineers ignore

AMPLIFY CONSOLE

SECURITY HARNESS

Agentic security harness. Custom detection agents tuned to your codebase, priority-aware triage, narrative reports leadership actually reads, and onboarding in days — not quarters.

Custom detection agents (not vendor CVE lists)
72-hour onboarding (not months)
Priority-aware triage automation
Reports engineers actually read
Month-to-month — no 3-year contracts
Cloud-to-production execution
Operations Cockpit — live view
//FEATURE COMPARISON

Enterprise SAST does compliance.
Console does security work.

Not a takedown. A clear map of where each tool starts and stops.

CAPABILITY
CHECKMARX / VERACODE
AMPLIFY CONSOLE
Enterprise compliance certifications
Full
Partial
Onboarding time
Months
72 hours
Custom detection agents
Vendor CVE lists
Built-in
Agentic triage automation
Priority-aware
Contract terms
3-year typical
Month-to-month
Narrative reports engineers read
Compliance-focused
Engineer-native
Cloud-to-production execution
Limited
Deep plumbing
Operations Cockpit (live view)
Real-time
Custom SAST rules at scale
Vendor library
OpenGrep + agents
Security-engineer-native workflows
Partial
Purpose-built
//WHO WINS WHEN

The honest answer.

Checkmarx and Veracode are still the safe choice for compliance-driven enterprises with locked-in procurement. Console is the choice for security engineers who want speed, customization, and tools their team will actually use.

KEEP USING CHECKMARX/VERACODE WHEN:

  • You need specific enterprise compliance certifications
  • Established audit trails are a procurement mandate
  • Your team is locked into long contracts that aren't renegotiable
  • Broad legacy language coverage is critical
  • Compliance is the primary security deliverable

SWITCH TO CONSOLE WHEN:

  • You want speed, customization, and actual usability
  • Custom detection agents matter more than vendor CVE lists
  • Onboarding in 72 hours beats months of professional services
  • Month-to-month contracts beat 3-year commits
  • Reports engineers actually read are a requirement, not a wish

Console can run alongside your existing Checkmarx or Veracode deployment during transition. No rip-and-replace required.

//READY TO ACT ON REACHABILITY?

Your SAST vendor wrote the report.
Console drives the security work.

We'll connect Console to your existing ASPM signals in 72 hours.Keep your reachability stack. Add detection, triage, and reporting on top.

BOOK A STRATEGY CALL →