An ASPM Platform vs Post-Reachability Orchestration.
Endor Labs and Apiiro lead on ASPM and reachability — understanding which OSS vulnerabilities are exploitable in production. Console does this too, then keeps going: custom detection agents, agentic triage, and narrative reporting after reachability is established.
SEE CONSOLE IN ACTION →ASPM maps the risk.
Console orchestrates the response.
Endor Labs and Apiiro tell you which OSS vulnerabilities reach production. That's critical context. But once you know what's exploitable, you still need detection beyond OSS, triage automation, and a way to drive remediation through real workflows. That's what Console adds.
ENDOR LABS / APIIRO
Application Security Posture Management. Strong on OSS reachability, SBOM depth, and exploitability scoring. Tells you which dependencies actually reach production code paths.
AMPLIFY CONSOLE
Agentic security harness. Reachability is one signal among many. Console adds custom detection agents tuned to your codebase, priority-aware triage, cloud-to-production execution, and narrative reports.
ASPM stops at exploitability.
Console drives the response.
Not a takedown. A clear map of where each tool starts and stops.
The honest answer.
ASPM platforms and Console solve different layers of the same problem. Endor/Apiiro answer 'is it exploitable?'. Console answers 'what happens next?'
KEEP ENDOR/APIIRO WHEN:
SWITCH TO CONSOLE WHEN:
Console ingests reachability signals from ASPM tools like Endor and Apiiro. You don't lose what you've built — you add the orchestration layer security engineers actually need.
Your ASPM tells you what's exploitable.
Console drives the response.
We'll connect Console to your existing ASPM signals in 72 hours.
Keep your reachability stack. Add detection, triage, and reporting on top.